Meeting documents
- Meeting of Resources Overview Committee, Tuesday, 5th December, 2017 6.30 pm (Item 20.)
Minutes:
The draft
Revenue Budget 2018/19 was presented to the Committee for consideration. The context of the budget was the continuing
reduction in central government funding. All services were now provided by
joint teams with South Bucks District Council. This was reflected in the Chiltern budgets by recharges to or
from South Bucks in respect of the costs
of the various teams. On 24 July 2017 it
was agreed by the Joint Committee that from 2018/19 the standard cost split
should be amended to CDC 58%/SBDC 42% and this would be used for all services
except Revenues & Benefits and Waste (which had separate
arrangements). These percentages were in
line with the population split which was the basis of the cost share set out in
the Inter Authority Agreement, and would be easier to administrate and would
result in a negligible financial change overall.
The overall
position for the draft Revenue Budget 2018/19 was for an increase in the Net
Cost of Services of 2.3%. Inflation estimates
were shown in section 4 with salaries at 1% (the Joint Staffing Committee would
consider locally determined pay increase in January 2018) and contracts
inflation of 3.3%. Any surplus would be
added to the reserves (section 7) and it was noted that the Support Services
PAG would be discussing the level of and use of reserves. The final decisions would be made by Cabinet
in February 2018 after the final funding settlement from Government was
announced (expected by the end of 2017).
The Council was
undertaking a number of large investment projects funded by borrowing and the
Committee discussed the proposed borrowing for the Car Park and it was asked
whether the interest element should be capitalised. It was advised that this was not something
done at CDC previously. It was discussed
that this was an accounting procedure that would be done in the private sector
and something for Cabinet to consider.
With regard to
employee expenditure (listed on page 32), there was a request to consider
whether it would be possible for the FTE details to be inserted alongside the
budget figures in future, so that a direct comparison could be made. It was agreed that this may be possible with
an additional table. It was acknowledged
that the changes to cost shares that have taken place in the budgets this year make
direct comparisons difficult but that this would become easier once the changes
are complete.
Appendix 3
A request was
made for the major changes to be itemised for each service, with explanatory
notes for the salient points.
Appendix 4
It was asked
whether the Customer Services team dealt with Waste queries and if so why there
was no recharge relating to Waste. It
was advised that WDC did pay a contribution to a range of overheads and this
recharge was shown within the waste cost centre.
With regard to
the training agreement for Revenues with Dacorum, it
was advised that the formal arrangement had come to an end at Dacorum’s request.
Appendix 5
Questions were
asked relating to the funding for air quality.Â
It was advised that less funding was available from Defra which grant
funded most of the activities.
Appendix 6
With regard to
the income from car parking, there was concern that there was no provision made
for the loss of income during the rebuilding.Â
It was advised that the staff were no longer parking there, so although
there were 140 less spaces, there should be less of an impact on the level of
income from public parking.
Appendix 7
It was reported that the IT cost had
gone down in Business Support because license and software costs are being
accounted for in the actual services that were using them. This was another accounting change that would
become more straightforward in future.
RESOLVED
To note the draft revenue service budget for 2018/19.
Note
2:Â Councillor I Darby left the meeting
at 7.15 pm
Supporting documents: